Teaching Academic Writing in European Higher EducationLennart Björk, Gerd Bräuer, L. Rienecker, Peter Stray Jörgensen DAVID R. RUSSELL English Department of Iowa State University, U. S. A. I was fortunate to attend, as a visitor from the U. S. , the first European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing (EATAW) conference in 2001 at Groningen. I was struck by the similarities in the challenges higher education faces on both sides of the Atlantic in terms of developing students’ academic writing, and students’ learning through writing. It is indeed an international ‘problem. ’ But I was equally struck by the profound differences in responding to these challenges – among - tions, institutions, disciplines, and even within disciplines. The essays in this - traordinary volume address a growing demand for help with academic writing, on the part of students and academic staff alike. And they do so in ways that bring fresh approaches, not only to Europeans, who have only recently begun to study academic writing, but also to researchers and academic staff in the U. S. , where we have a c- tury-old tradition of attention to the problem – but are much in need of these fresh approaches. Academic writing has become a ‘problem’ in higher education – all around the world – because higher education sits smack between two contradictory pressures. On one end, far more students (and far more diverse students) come streaming into higher education – bringing in a far greater diversity of linguistic resources (often interpreted as ‘standards are falling,’ as Frank, Haacke & Tente point out). |
Contents
TEACHING ACADEMIC WRITING IN EUROPEAN HIGHER | 1 |
ACADEMIC WRITING IN THE FIRST YEAR 19 | 17 |
TEXT TYPES TEXTUAL CONSCIOUSNESS AND ACADEMIC | 29 |
TEACHING ACADEMIC WRITING TO INTERNATIONAL | 41 |
USING MODEL | 59 |
TEACHING ACADEMIC | 75 |
ASYMMETRY IN DISGUISE 87 | 86 |
THE IMPOSSIBILITIES IN TEACHING UNIVERSITY WRITING | 101 |
WRITING AT NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITIES IN AN | 151 |
CONTACTS CONFLICTS COOPERATION | 165 |
AN ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSE OF STUDY SUPPORT AT | 175 |
CREATING A BASIS FOR A FACULTYORIENTED WRITING | 185 |
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR STUDY SUPPORT | 195 |
| 209 | |
AUTHOR INDEX | 223 |
| 231 | |
HELPING DOCTORAL STUDENTS TO FINISH THEIR THESES | 113 |
CENTRES FOR WRITING READING BRIDGING THE GAP | 135 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic paper academic staff academic texts analysis Anglo-American approach argument Bielefeld Björk Blythman Bräuer Breistein chapter cognitive concept context continental criteria culture curriculum demic dents difficulties discipline-specific disciplines discourse discourse communities discussion Dysthe epistemology essay European Higher Education experience faculty focus foreign language genre German Gothenburg University important individual initial integration international students knowledge knowledge-transforming Kruiningen Kruse learning lecturers linguistic Lonka methods model examples Netherlands Norwegian offer participants peer practice research question Rienecker specific strategies Stray Jörgensen structure student writing study support team tacit knowledge teachers teaching academic writing teaching of academic teaching of writing term paper text types text-type tion Toulmin model tradition tutors understanding University of Bergen University of Bielefeld University of Copenhagen University of Toledo volume workshops writ writing course writing instruction Writing Lab writing pedagogy writing process writing programme Writing Project writing skills
